|
| |
|
|
 |
 |
 |

SEATTLE TO CLEAR ARREST RECORDS, PAY $1 MILLION TO WTO PROTESTERS WRONGFULLY
ARRESTED IN 1999
Settlement Requires Overhaul of Police Training

The City of Seattle has agreed to pay $1 Million and
clear the arrest records of WTO Protesters who were
wrongfully arrested in 1999. |
In a landmark settlement
reached by Public Justice on behalf of scores of people arrested
in 1999 while peacefully protesting the World Trade
Organization, the City of Seattle has agreed to seal and expunge
the records of what a jury earlier determined to be their
unconstitutional arrests by Seattle police.
In addition, the settlement mandates that the City improve
police training in order to prevent unconstitutional mass
arrests in the future. Finally, the City will pay $1 million to
compensate the protesters for the violation of their
constitutional rights and the costs of bringing the lawsuit.
|
Notice of Class Action
Settlement to WTO Protesters
If you were arrested in
Seattle, Washington, on the morning of December 1, 1999, at Westlake
Park, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. For a copy
of the settlement agreement,
click here; for the notice of a class action settlement,
click
here; for the claims form due by August
28, 2007,
click
here.
|
Following an 11-day trial in January, a civil court jury found
the City liable for violating the protesters’ Fourth Amendment rights. The verdict in Hankin v.
City of Seattle and settlement followed seven years of
litigation and determined work by the Public Justice legal team.
“It’s a shame when justice is delayed any length of time,
especially seven years,” said lead plaintiff Kenneth Hankin, a
Boeing fuel systems engineer. “The verdict and this settlement
not only vindicate the rights of the people who peacefully and
lawfully protested in 1999, but will help ensure that future
dissent is treated as intended in a free society.”
The class action lawsuit, filed in 2000, arose from the events
of December 1, 1999, when police corralled and arrested
approximately 175 people who were peacefully protesting the WTO
in downtown Seattle’s Westlake Park. The City had invited and
encouraged the WTO to hold its ministerial conference in
Seattle. By the time the conference began in late November, tens
of thousands of individuals and organizations with a range of
concerns from globalization and labor to endangered species and
human rights converged on the city to protest WTO policies.
After one day of widespread but largely peaceful protest,
Seattle’s mayor declared a swath of the downtown business core
off-limits to all but certain citizens in what many observers
saw as an exaggerated response to isolated disturbances by some
individuals. Although the order did not specifically prohibit
protests within the area, city officials and Seattle police
called it a “no protest zone.” Hundreds of peaceful protesters
were then arrested.
All charges against those arrested in the “zone” were later
dropped, but not before many of the demonstrators were held in
jail for up to four days — until the WTO conference had ended.
No police officers were ever reprimanded or disciplined by the
City.
Based largely on testimony by Seattle Police Department leaders,
Public Justice co-lead trial counsel Michael Withey argued that
the arrests adhered to City policy or, at minimum, had been
approved by policymakers within the department. The jury agreed,
finding that the City was responsible for the unconstitutional
arrests. In addition to Withey, the plaintiffs were represented
at trial by Public Justice co-lead trial counsel Tyler Weaver of
Seattle; Seattle attorney Fred Diamondstone; and attorney Leslie
Bailey, the Brayton-Baron Fellow at Public Justice.
After the jury verdict, Seattle faced further litigation on the
damages owed to the peaceful protesters it unconstitutionally arrested. To avoid the trials,
the City agreed to settle the case.
“This settlement brings to a close an important chapter in the
history of this City,” said Withey. “The lesson to draw is that
the full constitutional rights of citizens can be guaranteed at
the same time public safety is secured. The court, the jury and
now the City of Seattle have validated this vital principle. We
are proud to hold the city accountable and to contribute to this
important victory.”
Weaver said he was pleased that the Westlake Park demonstrators
would be compensated, but that the full outcome of the case has
a much more significant meaning.
“Most importantly, the jury’s verdict in this case is a sign
that our Constitution is alive and well,”Weaver said. “I am
hopeful that this case will send a message not only to the City
of Seattle but to cities around the country that mass arrests of
peaceful, law-abiding protesters will not and cannot be
tolerated.”
Diamondstone noted that the settlement serves “an important
lesson for police departments around the country that have
looked to Seattle’s WTO experience” when large numbers of
protesters gather in other large cities. “The proper lesson is
to avoid repetition of the fiasco in Seattle by allowing
peaceful protesters to gather, as guaranteed by the
Constitution,” Diamondstone said.
Pursuant to the settlement agreement, which is subject to court
approval, the City of Seattle has agreed not only to seal its
own records of the arrests, but also to formally request that
other agencies expunge any records they may have received or
maintained regarding the December 1, 1999 arrests. The City will
also notify the agencies that the Westlake class members were
never tried or convicted of any offense. The sealing and
expungement of arrest records is of particular importance to
members of the class, who were concerned about the potential
effect on their reputations and good standing in the eyes of law
enforcement.
Perhaps most significantly, the City has agreed to incorporate
key court rulings from the Hankin case into police training.
Those rulings make clear that police lacked probable cause to
arrest both the peaceful protesters at Westlake and others
arrested outside the “no protest zone.” Improved training will
help ensure that police officers will protect individuals’
constitutional rights against unlawful search and seizure in the
future.
The monetary settlement negotiated by Public Justice will secure
a financial recovery for each protester in the range of $3,000
to $10,000, depending on the number of class members who file
claims. The settlement fund will be paid with insurance
proceeds, rather than by City taxpayers.
In addition to the trial team, the plaintiffs were represented
by Public Justice Staff Attorney Victoria Ni and Public Justice
Executive Director Arthur Bryant.
|
|
|
^^ BACK TO TOP ^^
|
 |
 |
 |
National
Headquarters
1825 K Street, NW
Suite 200
Washington, DC 20006
ph: 202-797-8600
fax: 202-232-7203 |

Public Justice
© 2007 Public Justice Foundation
www.publicjustice.net |
West Coast
Office
555 12th Street
Suite 1620
Oakland, CA 94607
ph: 510-622-8150
fax: 510-622-8155 |
|
|