What’s at Stake A coalition, led by the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA) and composed of nonprofit organizations focused on fair housing, civil rights, and immigration advocacy, today asked a federal court in Texas to refuse to enter the proposed settlement agreement in Consumer Financial...
Several media organizations, represented by nonprofit legal advocacy organizations Public Justice and Public Accountability, have filed a motion to intervene to protect the public’s right of access to records in Oregon v. Trump, a lawsuit stemming from the deployment of the National Guard in Oregon...
What’s at Stake Public Justice is representing independent news publication Law Dork to ask the court to lift the access restriction on the electronic docket for U.H.A. v. Bondi, a civil lawsuit stemming from the mass warrantless detention of lawfully admitted refugees in Minnesota. Because...
What’s at Stake The public has a significant interest in learning what occurs and has occurred inside Adelanto ICE Processing Center, one of the largest detention centers in the country run by GEO Group. But, opportunities for the public to learn what happens inside the...
What’s at Stake In TransUnion v. Ramirez, the U.S. Supreme Court made explicit that alleging a violation of a statute is not enough to have standing to bring a lawsuit in federal court under Article III of the U.S. Constitution—instead, a plaintiff must show a...
What’s at stake Whether undocumented immigrants who graduate from Kentucky high schools have access to the same affordable college education as their classmates. Summary Like over two dozen other state laws, a Kentucky regulation has long allowed undocumented immigrants who graduate local high schools to attend...
What’s at Stake Along with co-counsel at Public Citizen, Towards Justice, and FarmSTAND, Public Justice filed a lawsuit challenging a recent memorandum from the EEOC directing the closure of all charges alleging disparate impact discrimination and prohibiting the investigation and conciliation of disparate impact charges...
What’s at Stake We filed an amicus brief on behalf of all Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee and the House Financial Services Committee—the committees that oversee the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)—and urged the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to...
What’s at stake This appeal before the Tenth Circuit raises important questions about access to courts and the link between incarceration and litigation costs. Fees and other costs are used to retaliate against incarcerated people and suppress court claims about prison conditions. Our amicus brief...
What’s at Stake In this case, Amazon unsuccessfully tried to avoid liability for allegedly abusing the most basic rights of transportation workers by forcing the workers’ claims into arbitration using a different company’s arbitration agreement and arguing that these transportation workers are not exempt from...
What’s at Stake This case presents the question whether the president has unilateral authority to, without cause, fire commissioners of independent agencies. Summary In March 2025, President Trump purported to fire Rebecca Slaughter, a Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), partway through the term...
What’s at Stake This case presents us with the opportunity to urge the Ninth Circuit to narrowly interpret its jurisdiction to hear qualified immunity cases on appeal. Judge-made immunity doctrines like qualified and sovereign immunity make litigating claims against government actors like police officers and...