Quantcast
 

Fifth Circuit Federal Appeals Court Holds Family’s Wrongful Death Suit Against For-Profit Prison Must Go to Jury, Reviving Due Process Claims

Fifth Circuit Federal Appeals Court Holds Family’s Wrongful Death Suit Against For-Profit Prison Must Go to Jury, Reviving Due Process Claims

For Immediate Release
July 27, 2022

Contact: Lucy Sears
(240) 676-4499 | lsears@publicjustice.net

Fifth Circuit Federal Appeals Court Holds Family’s Wrongful Death Suit Against For-Profit Prison Must Go to Jury, Reviving Due Process Claims

On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturned a district court’s ruling and held there is evidence that a private, for-profit prison in Louisiana regularly beat detainees in a camera-free hallway and used chemical spray on them while they were handcuffed. According to the Court, there is evidence that this is what happened to Erie Moore, Jr. and that the guards’ use of excessive force caused his death.

In October 2015, Mr. Moore, a Black man being held at Richwood Correctional Center, a private prison in rural Louisiana, owned and operated by LaSalle Management, a for-profit company, died after he was assaulted, slammed multiple times to the floor headfirst, sprayed with chemicals while handcuffed, and repeatedly beaten by the guards in charge. All this happened within one day of Mr. Moore’s detention at the prison for a non-violent, misdemeanor of disturbing the peace.  Mr. Moore’s family filed a civil rights lawsuit under § 1983 and state tort law against the individual officers involved, the private prison facility and its management company, and the City of Monroe, Louisiana. Despite the brutal violence against Mr. Moore, some of which is depicted on video, the district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on nearly all claims, including holding that there was insufficient evidence to show that the prison had anything to do with Mr. Moore’s death; that private prisons can’t be held liable for punitive damages; and that the City of Monroe can’t be held liable for delegating its authority to a private prison company. Friday’s ruling reverses those decisions.

In an important victory for the family of Mr. Moore, the Fifth Circuit found there was sufficient evidence to support the family’s constitutional claims against the individual guards, the private prison, the private prison operator, and the City. The decision ensures that Mr. Moore’s family will have the opportunity to present their case to a jury and hold the defendants accountable for their horrific offenses. The Court also held that the Moore family could seek punitive damages against the defendants, rejecting the private corporations’ claim that they are entitled to immunity that is sometimes applied to state and local governments. In this case, the Fifth Circuit held there is evidence that the defendants acted with extreme disregard for Mr. Moore’s rights and failed to provide medical aid despite the grave injuries they had inflicted.

“The Moore family has fought nearly seven years for justice for their father’s violent mistreatment by LaSalle’s for-profit prison and its staff,” said James Anglin Flynn of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, who argued the appeal. “Now, the Fifth Circuit has recognized that the strength of our evidence requires a jury to decide these claims at trial, and we look forward to holding the defendants accountable for their pattern of abuses.”

“Winning this case won’t bring back Erie Moore, but it will bring some measure of justice to his grieving family—and help shine a spotlight on the terrible human rights abuses in the private prison industry,” said Ellen Noble of Public Justice. “This ruling sends a powerful message to private prison operators that they cannot evade the civil justice system and that they will be held liable for their actions.”

The Moore family was represented in the appeal by James Anglin Flynn, Mark S. Davies, Melanie Hallums, Joseph R. Kolker, and Jodie Liu of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP; Leslie Bailey, John He, and Ellen Noble of Public Justice; Tiffany R. Wright, Jade Gasek, and Ciarra Carr of Howard University School of Law Civil Rights Clinic; Leslie Brueckner of Bailey & Glasser; and Nelson Welch Cameron.



Skip to content